Phantom Liberty: A Choice That Broke Night City (And the Internet)
Okay, choombas, let's talk about the elephant in the room – or rather, the existential dread lurking in Night City's shadows: Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty's ending. We're not talking about a simple "good" versus "bad" scenario here. Oh no, CD Projekt Red decided to crank up the emotional dial to eleven, leaving players with choices so impactful, so morally ambiguous, that they've sparked more debates than a presidential election in the metaverse. So, what went down? You're thrust into a high-stakes game of espionage, betrayals, and maybe a little bit of cyberware-induced psychosis, and it all boils down to a decision that irrevocably alters V's fate – and their relationship with Johnny Silverhand (Keanu Reeves' digital ghost in your head). What's interesting is that, depending on your choice, you can actually get an entirely new ending to the base game, potentially trading your cyberpunk edge for a normal, but maybe boring, life. Ironic, isn't it?
Trust me, picking sides in this whole drama is like trying to choose between a free cybernetic arm and a lifetime supply of ramen – both have their appeal, but also some serious drawbacks. Prepare for some serious feels, because we're diving deep into the aftermath of these choices and why they've got the Cyberpunk community in a chokehold.
The Players and the Pawns
So, what is it about these endings that has everyone throwing their cybernetic fists in the air? It all boils down to the impossible choices, the betrayal, and the understanding that there is no right and wrong answer.
The Songbird Dilemma
Songbird, or So Mi, is the lynchpin of Phantom Liberty. A netrunner with immense power and a whole heap of problems, she becomes V's unlikely ally. Your interactions with her directly affect your path, because it's through her that you may eventually cure your condition. As you journey to save her, you become a part of her struggles, and you are forced to see things from her point of view. A lot of the debate comes down to deciding what's best for Songbird, and that's where you can make your life harder or easier.
Betrayal is a dish best served cold
Depending on the choice you make, betrayal becomes the central theme. Reed, the FIA agent who recruited you to work for the NUSA, may not be who you expect him to be. And in the end, betrayal comes with a heavy cost in the cyberpunk world, where trust is rare to come by.
The Ripple Effect
It's not just about personal preference; the decisions you make in Phantom Liberty send ripples throughout the entire game world. Here’s how.
The Tower Ending
One of the most impactful choices leads to the "Tower" ending. In this scenario, V chooses to help Reed hand Songbird over to the NUSA. In exchange, V receives treatment that removes the Relic and Johnny Silverhand. Sounds great, right? Except, it comes at a steep price. V loses their cyberware, their abilities, and essentially becomes a normal person. They return to Night City, but the city feels different, alien. Many perceive this as a "bad" ending because it strips V of everything that made them who they were. It's like trading in your souped-up sportscar for a sensible sedan. Sure, it gets you from point A to point B, but where's the fun in that?
The King of Pentacles Ending
Alternatively, you can side with Songbird and help her escape. This path often leads to confrontation with Reed and a potentially tragic outcome for both Songbird and Reed. This choice can create even more problems for V in the end, even if that means V would continue to live life with Johnny Silverhand and all of their cyberware. Although many people don't pick this option, the thrill of the chase may be exactly what the players are looking for.
New Base Game Ending
Here's the kicker: Regardless of which side you choose, Phantom Liberty can unlock a brand new ending for the base game. Specifically, the "Tower" ending allows V to call Reed for assistance in removing the Relic. This offers players a chance to pursue a radically different resolution to V's main story arc, one that prioritizes survival over their cyberpunk identity. It's a bold move by CD Projekt Red, essentially rewriting the ending for players who've already invested countless hours into the game.
Why the Division?
So, why are these endings causing such a ruckus? Several factors are at play:
Moral Ambiguity
There's no clear "right" or "wrong" answer. Each choice comes with its own set of sacrifices and consequences. Do you prioritize Songbird's freedom or V's survival? Do you trust the FIA or risk everything on a desperate escape? These are questions that force players to confront their own values and consider the lesser of two evils. I read one player said that they were up for two nights trying to decide, and ended up having their friend make the choice for them.
Character Investment
Players become deeply invested in V and their relationships throughout the game. The thought of losing Johnny Silverhand, or seeing V become a shell of their former self, is emotionally taxing. When you care about these characters, any choice will seem like a sacrifice. It's like choosing which of your favorite pets to send to a farm upstate – nobody wants to do it.
The Cyberpunk Ethos
The cyberpunk genre is built on themes of rebellion, transhumanism, and fighting against oppressive systems. The "Tower" ending, with its emphasis on conformity and surrendering to the NUSA, feels like a betrayal of these ideals to some players. They argue that V giving up their cyberware and individuality is a rejection of everything the genre stands for. It's like watching a punk rocker trade in their leather jacket for a business suit. Sacrilege!
Subjective Interpretation
Ultimately, the "best" ending is subjective. What one player considers a tragic loss, another might see as a peaceful resolution. Some prefer the chaos and uncertainty of the cyberpunk life, while others yearn for a chance at normalcy, however fleeting it may be. A reviewer on Metacritic made the point that the division stems from differing player expectations and desired outcomes. And because the game can be changed with mods, the choices are truly endless.
The Legacy of Phantom Liberty
Phantom Liberty has undoubtedly left its mark on the Cyberpunk 2077 universe. It's not just an expansion; it's a philosophical exercise that forces players to confront their own morality and consider the consequences of their choices. The endings, with their ambiguity and emotional weight, have sparked countless discussions and debates, proving that CD Projekt Red isn't afraid to take risks and challenge player expectations.
The game has been re-evaluated by critics and players alike, and the expansion is generally seen as an improvement over the original gameplay. This means that it's worth buying if you haven't bought it yet, especially if you're bored and have time to kill.
Final Thoughts
Phantom Liberty's endings are a masterclass in player agency and narrative consequence. They've ignited passionate debates, forced us to question our own values, and ultimately, enriched the Cyberpunk 2077 experience. The key takeaways? Choices matter, betrayal cuts deep, and sometimes, the hardest decisions are the ones without a clear right or wrong answer.
Remember, choombas, even in the darkest corners of Night City, hope can be found. Embrace the chaos, make your own choices, and never stop fighting for what you believe in. Whether that's a cure for your digital brain parasite or a lifetime supply of noodles, you get to decide. Maybe you're more of a David Martinez, or a Reed, or a Songbird. Whatever you are, just be you.
So, which ending did you choose, and are you still regretting it? Don't be shy, share your pain and suffering (or triumph!) in the comments below. We're all in this existential crisis together.
0 Comments